<% IssueDate = "2/10/02" IssueCategory = "Entertainment" %> GayToday.com - Reviews
Entertainment
Catching Up with the Oscar Contenders

Film Reviews by John Demetry

It's that time of year for movie fans to catch up with the Oscar contenders. I did so myself, recently taking in six buzzed-about movies. I know it seems silly, but it can also make for a fun way of taking account of the state of movies.

The frustrating truth is that the Academy Awards are important for two reasons. First, for those who don't live in major metropolitan areas, sometimes the only art-house (independent and foreign) films that become or remain available are those that get Oscar validation.
Charlie Hunnam as Nicholas and Jamie Bell in Nicholas Nickleby

Second, many a young movie enthusiast first explores the terrain of classic and even contemporary cinema with the Oscars as a guide.

If the Academy members voting for the Oscars had a clue, they'd be sure to highlight, for moviegoers present and future, Douglas McGrath's splendid adaptation of Nicholas Nickleby. The star of the British Queer as Folk, Charlie Hunnam, makes a smashing, sexy Nicholas - conveying both goodness and pride with every matinee-idol twinkle. There's an almost queer sensitivity he shares with Jamie Bell's abused, orphaned Smike, one of the most moving characterizations of the year.

To contrast the virtuous, McGrath casts such actors as Christopher Plummer, Jim Broadbent, and Juliet Stevenson to give definitive portraits of Dickensian evil, always wrought with a sense of understanding for the squalor that deadens their hearts.

Although necessarily shearing Dickens' novel, McGrath sustains the sprawling connections between Industrial Revolution horrors and character motivation, still spiked by Dickens' engrossing plot twists and coincidences. That social-economic narrative rigor - originating in Dickens' mass-produced serial style - allows McGrath to honor the development of lower-class culture as in the contrasting productions of "Romeo and Juliet", the paper dolls of the title sequence, and the traveling-troupe stylization of the movie itself.

In addition, the extended family formed by Nicholas - as noted by Nathan Lane's drama-queen narration - links to the contemporary phenomenon of gay families. In adapting Dickens, McGrath recognizes the ongoing struggle to balance personal loss with perseverance.

Nicole Kidman likely will earn another Oscar nomination for her portrayal of Virginia Woolf in The Hours That's everything director Stephen Daldry fails to do with The Hours. Instead of recognizing a century of gay, feminist and popular culture, Daldry drapes the experience of three women in tony drabness. No vivacity! No ingenuity! Daldry allows Nicole Kidman to play Virginia Woolf, struggling through mental illness to write Mrs. Dalloway, as a petulant sadsack, not an anguished, vibrantly intelligent artist. That makes it easier to lie about the influence of the undeniable Mrs. Dalloway, focusing on the book's relationship to the lives of two lesbians played by Julianne Moore in 1951 and Meryl Streep in 2001.

Scored to Philip Glass' tinker-toy music, Daldry crosscuts between the three characters as if arranging flowers in a vase. The Hours shows the experience of art, sexuality, and AIDS, not as imparting compassion or in coping with oppression or examining states of consciousness, but as an avenue to phony psychobabble liberation allowed by economic security. The year's most despicable Oscar-baiting screen moment: Ed Harris, as a gay poet suffering with AIDS, throws himself out of a window so that friend Streep can get over her neurotic hang-ups.

No wonder a gay filmmaker as joyfully subversive a lover of pop culture as Pedro Almodovar seems to feel that in order to be taken seriously he also has to be dull. The use of modern dance in Talk to Her introduces the film's theme of male adoration and female subjugation. That and the (lame) silent film aside (featuring an incredibly shrinking man climbing inside of a giant vagina) reveal an artist no longer reveling in the hidden sexual codes within pop forms. The closest he gets are shots of dreamy Dario Grandinetti crying. However, even his tears are incited by conventional standards of "beauty," while Almodovar locates the source of his emotions in typical hetero anxiety.

Oscar winners Nicolas Cage and Meryl Streep in Adaptation There's more hetero anxiety in the totally unpleasant Adaptation. Reuniting the director (Spike Jonze) and screenwriter (Charlie Kaufman) of the inventive and insightful "Being John Malkovich", Adaptation is endlessly self-referential.

The plot of Adaptation concerns the efforts of Charlie Kaufman (played by Nicolas Cage) to write Adaptation. Doing so, he overcomes his insufficient social skills with women, yet Jonze's visual style lacks any kind of erotic relationship to its subjects (maybe that would be too Hollywood). Meanwhile, Charlie learns to balance Hollywood conventions with his own artsy self-consciousness. The problem: Artsy self-consciousness IS a Hollywood convention.

Former Spielberg collaborator Menno Mejyes knows it. That's the almost-salvaging grace of his directorial debut, Max. Publicists courting Oscar voters started the rumor that the Weimar-era Max is supposed to "humanize" Adolf Hitler. As played by Noah Taylor, a humanized Hitler is surely not a monster, but a loud-mouthed, unlikable, pathetic, unimaginative, vulgar son-of-a-bitch (whodathunk?). Luckily, Taylor and John Cusack (as fictional art dealer Max Rothman) are in on Meyjes' elaborate joke.

The conceit of Max is that Hitler's kitsch politics instigated the postmodern age. Meyjes uses the spectator's knowledge of what is to come to position every moment of the film, mixing low-brow humor (puns) with the modernist-era Expressionist visuals that connote the time (perhaps it holds the secret of history). Investigating the relationship of contemporary audiences to art and history, Meyjes settles on moral platitudes. Is it kitsch? "Modernism"? Or postmodernism? Who cares?

Roman Polanski also sets his artistic inquiry amidst the historical fact of the Holocaust in the The Pianist. Polanski's, however, is a spellbinding, clear-eyed vision. Awesome images of pianist Wlaydslaw Szpilman (Adrien Brody) dwarfed by a blasted out Warsaw or of atrocities (and resistance) from Szpilman's point of view exemplify Polanski's existential perversity - and maybe reveal the source of his unique perspective. Adrien Brody is earning Oscar buzz for his role in The Pianist

The much-misread final (credits) sequence is one of the most hypnotic screen moments: those hands, elaborating on the variants in the music, resonate with experience. It would be a shame if the Oscars (and history) deemed the life-sustaining ingenuity signified by Polanski's latest and McGrath's adaptation of Dickens to be insignificant.
For More ...
Related Stories
The Best Movies of 2002

The Best Films of 2001

Reeling 2002: Chicago's 21st International Film Festival

Related Sites
Nicholas Nickelby: Official Site

The Hours: Official Site

Talk to Her: Official Site

Adaptation: Official Site

Max: Official Site

The Pianist: Official Site