<% IssueDate = "09/25/02" IssueCategory = "Events" %> GayToday.com - Top Story
Top Story
Bush's War Drums Draw Focus
Away from Problems at Home


Kentucky's LBGT Newspaper Editor says: 'It's the Oil, Stupid!'

Sen. Robert C. Byrd says U.S. Constitution is Irrelevant to Bush

Compiled by GayToday

Washington, D.C.-David Williams, editor of The Letter, Kentucky's LBGT newspaper, has penned a forthcoming October editorial about George W. Bush's war plans, saying "It's the Oil, Stupid!"

Senator Robert C. Byrd (Democrat-West Virginia) believes that Bush's war drums are loud because he's trying to keep Americans' focus off of sadly deteriorating conditions on the homefront.

Byrd, speaking Friday before the U.S. Senate, said:

"This administration, all of a sudden, wants to go to war with Iraq…The [political] polls are dropping, the domestic situation has problems.... So all of a sudden we have this war talk, war fervor, the bugles of war, drums of war, clouds of war.
Sen. Robert Byrd: Bush war is a distraction from 'sadly deteriorating conditions on the homefront'

"Don't tell me that things suddenly went wrong. Back in August, the president had no plans.... Then all of a sudden this country is going to war…

"Are politicians talking about the domestic situation, the stock market, weaknesses in the economy, jobs that are being lost, housing problems? No."

Byrd recalled the folly of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution passed by the U.S. Congress in 1964 and which gave Lyndon Johnson the broad powers he used to widen the Vietnamese war. This folly cost 58,202 American lives and contributed to the murder millions of foreign citizens.

If such a war resolution is passed today, Senator Byrd warned his Senate colleagues:

"Congress will be putting itself on the sidelines… Nothing would please this president more than having such a blank check handed to him.

"Before the nation is committed to war, before we send our sons and daughters to battle in faraway lands, there are critical questions that must be asked. To date, the answers from the administration have been less than satisfying…

The Letter Editor David Williams "I cannot believe the gall and the arrogance of the White House in requesting such a broad grant of war powers…This is the worst kind of election-year politics."

Senator Hillary Clinton (Democrat-New York) expressed her hearty agreement with West Virginia's longtime Senator:

"It is the height of patriotism to ask such hard questions," she said. "No one exemplifies that more than the senior senator from West Virginia."

David Williams, editor of Kentucky's LBGT newspaper, The Letter points to oil profits that are likely behind the Bush Administration's war schemes:

"Wonder why Pres. George W. Bush still hasn't found any evidence that Iraq's ready to strike with weapons of mass destruction? Maybe because there aren't any. Or maybe there's some other reason he wants to send thousands of American boys to their deaths in the sands of the Middle East.

"Could it be…oil?

"According to John K. Cooley, writing on July 20 for ABCNews.com, there's such a demand for Iraq's low-sulfur oil that Saddam Hussein is counting on it to thwart the Bush administration's attempts at toppling him.

"Currently, 90% of Iraq's oil is going to refineries in Texas and Louisiana, which prize it because the sulfur is much easier to eliminate. Demand for Iraqi oil has become even more urgent since last March when nine refineries struck a deal with the Environmental Protection Agency and the Justice Dept. to clean up their act. They're now planning to spend about $400 million to install pollution controls, including special equipment to remove sulfur from crude oil. The less sulfur to deal with, the less expense.

"Another factor: middlemen. Currently U.S. refiners buy most of their Iraqi oil through Russian firms or middlemen working with Russian firms. Because it's a quicker route, American refineries are getting most of their Iraqi oil from Ceyhan, Turkey, terminus of a pipeline from the northern Iraqi city of Kirkuk. That restive capital of a Turkish speaking region has suffered culturally under Saddam's brutal rule.

"According to Martin Seif, writing for The Globalist on Sept. 12, internal Turkish politics-which no one has ever understood, not even the Turks-may also come into play. With more wealth coming into their country, Turkey's leaders could feel more secure against a potential surge of Islamic fundamentalism. That would suit the Pentagon, which considers Turkey potentially the region's most formidable-and friendliest-Islamic power in the coming years.

"If Saddam were to fall, the Russians could end up being the big losers as Americans draw up more favorable contracts with Iraq's new leaders. On the other hand, they could come out winners if Kirkuk were liberated. The Russians-always nervous about the Muslim populations on its southern borders-might breathe more easily if Kirkuk's Turkmenestans feel freer.

"Finally, there's those wealthy US Gulf Coast oil men: friends of the president's from way back. What's good for them is good for Bush's campaign coffers and the continuation of Republican domination of the country for some time to come.

"Less sulfur, fewer middlemen, greater profits, more campaign funds, happier Turks, happier Russians, happier Republicans. Those may be the real reasons George W. Bush -- the country's most famous AWOL National Guardsman --wants to plunge this country into a war that few want -- and even fewer will profit from.

"Cooley's report is located at http://abcnews.go.com/sections/world/DailyNews/iraq010720_cooley.html."
For More ...
Related Stories
No to War with Iraq! says Kentucky's LGBT Newspaper

One Year Leter: A New and More Terrible Danger

John Ashcroft's Expanding Power Grabs are Strongly Criticized

Related Sites
The Letter