top2.gif - 6.71 K

www.cybersocket.com

Vermont House Approves
Historic Legalization of 'Civil Unions'


Court-Ordered Recognition
of Same-Sex Couplings Passes 76-69


Confers Most Benefits and Burdens
of a Conventional Marriage


Compiled by GayToday

vermontgaycouple.jpg - 12.66 K Montpelier, Vermont—"Civil Unions"-- conferring on same-sex couples 300 of the primary benefits (and drawbacks) of legalized marriages-- were approved Thursday night by the Vermont House with a vote of 76-69.

The Vermont Senate is expected to follow with majority support for the new bill. Governor Howard Dean, a Democrat, is supportive of the legislation. Gay and lesbian marriage advocates are already touting a new slogan:

"Want to get married? Get engaged."

While Vermont's lawmakers voted, supporters and opponents of "civil unions" crowded the premises. Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund representatives present expressed satisfaction with the development, portraying it as setting a moral and legislative example for the nation.

While most benefits are conferred in the bill, a few, which require approval by the federal government, are not. These include such matters as federal taxes, immigration rights and social security.

Property transfers, medical decisions, insurance, state taxes and inheritance, however, place homosexual and heterosexual couplings on an equal footing.

Vermont has now moved farther toward recognizing the legitimacy of same-sex unions than has any other state. Although approximately 30 states have passed laws forbidding the recognition of same-sex marriages, it is not clear if "civil unions" could be assessed by those states as "marriages," and it remains possible that the full faith and credit of the state of Vermont might still—if the words "civil unions" are used— be acceptable in states that have already voted to ban same-sex-marriages.

Related Stories from the GayToday Archive:
Vermont Supreme Court: Gay & Lesbian Couples Equal

What Does the Vermont Decision Really Mean?

Falwell's Christmas Eve Sermon: Calamity in Vermont

Related Sites:
Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund

PrideNet: Vermont

Out in the Mountains

GayToday does not endorse related sites.

Attorney Susan Murray said:

"It totally depends on what state laws say in that other state and what courts would interpret in that other state…Other states have structures called marriage that they already recognize. They don't have structures called civil unions.''

Drawbacks for partners dissatisfied with their unions lie in that any break up would necessitate Family Court "dissolution'' proceedings just as married couples must attend when initiating divorce. They would also assume each other's debts as married couples must do.

bannerbot.gif - 8.68 K
© 1997-2000 BEI

Visit Badpuppy.com