Gay Today | Gay News, current events, entertainment, stories and features

Gay News


Badpuppy.com

Arkansas Supreme Court Rules
Against State's Sodomy Law


Local Lesbians & Gay Men Help End Second-class Citizenry

Law Had Violated Constitutional Rights to Privacy, Protection

Compiled by GayToday

Little Rock, Arkansas-- After hearing oral arguments (Jegley v. Picado) the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled favorably (Friday June 5) in a lawsuit argued late last month by the attorneys of seven lesbian and gay Arkansas residents who challenged the state's same-sex-only sodomy law.


The Supreme Court of Arkansas

Thus, the state's highest court is now affirming that the newly-defunct law constituted an unconstitutional invasion of privacy. It had been passed in 1977, the same year that religious fundamentalist Anita's Bryant's anti-gay crusades garnered national attention.

Friday's Arkansas Supreme Court decision says:

"We agree that the police power may not be used to enforce a majority morality on persons whose conduct does not harm others…A fundamental right to privacy is implicit in the Arkansas constitution."

Arkansas, until Friday, had been one of six states that specifically criminalized private, same-gender sex between (or among) consenting adults. Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Utah now remain as five U.S. hold-outs where same-sex lovemaking remains defined as criminal activity.

In June, The Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund had urged the court, on behalf of the plaintiffs, to strike down the state's ban on intimate relations between consenting adults of the same sex. Working with local counsel, Lambda Legal argued that the law had violated plaintiffs' constitutional rights to privacy and equal protection.

The Arkansas law had not applied to heterosexual couples, singling out only same-sex couples for a criminal ban on consensual sex with punishment up to one year in jail and a $1,000 fine.

Two of the Arkansas court's justices dissented, saying they should not act because no criminal case had been brought under the law. They argued that the plaintiffs had failed to show an actual threat of persecution or harm from the law's existence. No one, apparently, had been prosecuted under the 1977 law.

But Susan Sommer, supervising attorney for Lambda Legal, had told those same dissenting justices:

Related Stories from the GayToday Archive:
Arkansas High Court Asked to Rule Against State Sodomy Law

Arkansas Court Strikes Down Anti-Gay Sodomy Law

Texas Upholds Conviction of Two for Consensual Sex at Home

Related Sites:
Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund


GayToday does not endorse related sites.

"The men and women standing up in the Arkansas Supreme Court today are upstanding citizens of the state -- your neighbors, co-workers, brothers and sisters -- but they are deemed criminals under this sodomy law…They live with the threat of arrest every day. The stigma that hangs over them with this unfair law on the books fuels an atmosphere that condones discrimination, gay bashing and hate."





Visit Badpuppy.com