Highlights Bush-Plan Dangers Court Tells Tax-Funded Agency that its OK to Fire Lesbian Religious Organizations Using Public Funds Can Discriminate |
Compiled By GayToday
Anders added that while the Kentucky case is about a lesbian, it could as easily be about an unmarried pregnant woman or a white employee whose spouse is African American or an unmarried female employee living with her boyfriend. "Kentucky Baptist Homes for Children should play by the same rules that apply to everyone else receiving taxpayer money," Anders said. "Instead of responsibly using government money to hire the best qualified social worker, this agency applied its own discriminatory criteria -- which meant that the best person lost her job."
In Tuesday's decision on KBHC's motion to dismiss the case, the court dismissed all of the employment-related claims, but left intact claims about the funding relationship and provisions of services being unconstitutional. The decision comes on the heels of a controversial Congressional debate in Washington over H.R. 7, legislation to make real President George W. Bush's "faith-based initiative" to funnel additional public money into religious organizations and relax existing safeguards that prevent the money being used for religious purposes or discriminatory hiring. While the House ultimately adopted H.R. 7, it only did so after House leaders were able to quell an uprising among moderate Republicans concerned about government negotiations with the Salvation Army over its ability to override state and local laws that provide broader civil rights protections than federal law. "Today's decision is the next logical step to the Salvation Army controversy," Anders said. "Those who found the Salvation Army's requests disturbing should be horrified at today's decision in Louisville." Within a few weeks, the ACLU will decide whether to appeal the parts of the case that were dismissed, or proceed to trial on the remaining claims. "While we're pleased that the court recognized our concerns about government money funding religious institutions, we're deeply disappointed by the court's view of the employment aspects of the case," said Ken Choe, Staff Counsel with the ACLU's Lesbian and Gay Rights Project, which brought the case. For more information about the Pedreira case, see: http://www.aclu.org/features/f030901a.html |