Corpus Christi, Must Go On Indiana Politicians Claim it is 'An Attack on Christianity' People for the American Way Applauds a Wise Decision |
Compiled By GayToday
PFAWF and other organizations filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the case, urging the court to uphold the principles of academic freedom, the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of speech, and a proper reading of church-state separation law. The court agreed by ruling not to overturn a lower court decision denying a preliminary injunction, which is a win for the university, the defendant in the case.
Ralph G. Neas, president of PFAWF, said: "The 7th Circuit's ruling is a triumph for the university and its students, theater-goers, and all Americans who cherish their right to see and hear diverse ideas. The court wisely refused to block the production, recognizing that to do so would restrict academic freedom and freedom of speech. While we defend the right of the play's critics to protest peacefully against it, we disagree that threatening the university's funding or censoring the play is an appropriate demonstration against the play. One way for these would-be censors to voice their opposition is to simply not buy a ticket." Jan Czarnik, Midwest regional director of PFAWF, said that, had the court adopted the plaintiffs' reading of church-state separation law, state-run universities could become true "religion-free zones." "Public schools and their students would be limited in their ability to explore religion and religious ideas - even conventional Christian beliefs," said Czarnik. "For example, a state university could not show The Ten Commandments with Charlton Heston as part of a film series under the plaintiffs' interpretation of the Establishment Clause." |