top2.gif - 6.71 K

watermark3.gif - 15.76 K

Separation of Church & State Under Attack in Congress

Religious Fanatics Re-Introduce Deceptive Amendment

Protest: H.J. RES. 66—'Religious Freedom Amendment'


Compiled By GayToday

Washington, D.C.--On September 15, 1999, Representative Ernest J. Istook (R-OK) re-introduced the so-called "Religious Freedom Amendment," H.J. Res. 66.

Last year-- June 4, 1998-- the exact same bill (H.J. Res. 78) was soundly defeated by a vote of 224-203 in the U.S. House of Representatives; it failed to receive the necessary approval by two-thirds of the House.
eistookcross.jpg - 13.93 K
Rep. Istook

This proposed constitutional amendment would obliterate the separation of church and state and result in government-sanctioned worship, taxation to benefit religion, and majoritarian oppression. The proposed amendment states:

To secure the people's right to acknowledge God according to the dictates of conscience: Neither the United States nor any State shall establish any official religion, but the people's right to pray and to recognize their religious beliefs, heritage or traditions on public property, including schools, shall not be infringed.

Neither the United States nor any State shall require any person to join in prayer or other religious activity, prescribe school prayers, discriminate against religion, or deny equal access to a benefit on account of religion.

H.J. Res 66: The Specifics:

  • H.J.Res 66 is not a "Religious Freedom Amendment." Rather, it is a blueprint for religious tyranny. The separation of church and state has served this country well for more than 200 years, bringing America interfaith harmony, incredible religious vitality and a high rate of attendance at houses of worship. The proposed amendment removes that vital principle from our Constitution.

  • No new amendment is needed to guarantee a student's right to pray in public schools. H.J.Res 66 is designed to permit coercive programs of group prayer in public schools. Students who do not want to participate will be forced to single themselves out by getting up and leaving the room. Provisions in the amendment barring government officials from compelling participation in prayer are insufficient. In public schools, student "volunteers" could impose religious worship on their peers by reciting prayers in class, over the loud speaker, and at every school event.
  • Related Stories from the GayToday Archive:
    Barry Lynn: Defeating the Religious Right

    100 Rights You Don't Have

    Evesdropping on Pat Robertson's Christian Coalition

    Related Sites:
    Rep. Istook

    Americans United for the Separation of Church and State

    GayToday does not endorse related sites.

  • The provision in the amendment allowing "the people" to "recognize their religious beliefs, heritage or traditions on public property" is dangerously vague. Religious groups would be forced to compete with one another for government recognition and favors. Furthermore, private groups, including religious organizations, already have the right to acknowledge religion on government property under certain conditions.

  • H.J.Res 66 would force taxpayers to put their hard-earned money in the collection plates of houses of worship. For example, the provision stating that government shall not "deny equal access to a benefit on account of religion" forces government to give tax aid to religious groups for schools, social services, and other ministries. It taxes people to support religions in which they may not believe and is therefore a religion tax - - a notion that this country did away with more than 200 years ago.

  • Under this amendment, every religious group that wants public funding would have a constitutional right to receive it. It is estimated that there are nearly 2,000 separate religious denominations in the United States. The government simply does not have the money to fund religion on this scale. Even if just half of the groups demanded public aid, financial chaos would result. Either taxes would increase dramatically, the budget deficit would soar or other government services would have to be cut or eliminated. In addition, since the government cannot play favorites among religions, every group that asks would have to funded, including unpopular groups or denominations with unusual doctrines.

  • H.J.Res 66 is a huge step toward government control of religion. Giving religious groups a constitutional right to public funding also guarantees that they will be regulated by the state. The government simply does not hand out money with no strings attached.

  • Changing the First Amendment is a radical step that has never been done in the 206-year history of the Bill of Rights. Yet H.J.Res 66 guts the First Amendment's religious freedom protections. These rights, bequeathed to us by the Founding Fathers, are precious and should not be tampered with. The First Amendment was drafted by James Madison and other visionary thinkers of early American history. It is the height of arrogance for Religious Right lawyers, TV preachers and far-right operatives to believe they can improve upon Madison's eloquence.

    Action to Take:

    Please contact your U.S. Representatives and urge them to OPPOSE H.J. Res 66, and any similar legislation that would violate the constitutional principle of separation of church and state.

    U.S. Mail:
    The Honorable (Your Representative's name)
    U.S. House of Representatives
    Washington, D.C. 20515

    Telephone:
    Congressional Switchboard: 202/224-3121

    Internet:
    Contact your Congressional Representative www.house.gov/MemberWWW.html via email.

  • bannerbot.gif - 8.68 K
    © 1997-99 BEI

    Visit Badpuppy.com