Office of Personnel Management for DP Coverage Rep. Dave Weldon (R-Fla): Gay Relationships Demean Marriage Equal Benefits for Equal Work-Enrollee Won't Cost Taxpayers |
Compiled by GayToday
OPM Director Kay Coles James is slated to decide by October 15 on whether to include coverage of federal workers' domestic partners in the program, "Long-Term Care Insurance for the Federal Family." Opposition to the inclusion is coming from Representative Dave Weldon, R-Fla., the new chairman of the House Committee on Government Reform's Civil Service Subcommittee, who helps oversee the program. "Rather than redefining marriage and family to include homosexual, lesbian and cohabitating non-married couples, I believe we should be taking steps to encourage traditional marriages," said Weldon in a recent news report. "Extending benefits to other types of relationships only discourages individuals from making a lifelong marriage commitment."
"With such a wide range of people eligible for the program, it would be wrong and cruel to single out lesbian and gay families for exclusion," added Stachelberg. Inclusion of domestic partners has drawn congressional support. Rep. Danny Davis, D-Ill., ranking member of the Civil Service Subcommittee, last month sent a letter signed by a bipartisan group of several House members to OPM to request that same-sex life partners receive long-term care coverage. Additionally, HRC is working with Federal GLOBE, which works for fairness on sexual orientation and gender issues in the federal government, to have domestic partners included in the new benefit. HRC's Stachelberg and GLOBE's Kitti Durham sent a joint letter to OPM's James expressing the need to add domestic partners to the program. Four thousand companies, including 140 of the Fortune 500 firms, have implemented benefit programs that have domestic partner coverage, the letter noted. Progress on the issue occurred last month in the House when its members voted 226 to 194 - including 41 Republicans - to defeat an amendment that would have denied local funding for domestic partner benefits in Washington as part of the fiscal year 2002 District of Columbia Appropriations bill. |