Act of 2001 Goes into Effect Protects Gays' & Lesbians' Jobs, Housing & Accommodations Referendum Petition Withdrawn in Response to ACLU Lawsuit |
Compiled By GayToday
The ACLU of Maryland filed suit, charging that the referendum petitions filed by TakeBackMaryland did not meet the state constitutional standards for taking a popularly passed law to referendum. TakeBackMaryland stipulated today that they did not have enough valid signatures for a referendum under Maryland law. Under Maryland law, today's stipulation means that the Anti-Discrimination Act is now forever safe from referendum challenges. "This is an enormous victory for Maryland gays and lesbians who now can live free from prejudice," said Dwight Sullivan, Managing Attorney for the ACLU of Maryland's Baltimore office. "This is also a victory for all Marylanders as the Free State becomes one of just 12 states (plus D.C.) that bars discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation." Anne Arundel County Judge Eugene M. Lerner ruled today that TakeBackMaryland had an insufficient number of signatures and that the referendum on the Anti-Discrimination Act would therefore not take place. Had there been a referendum vote in November of 2002, discrimination against individuals because of their sexual orientation could have continued legally (except in Baltimore, Howard, Montgomery and Prince George's counties and in state government) until the issue was decided by the voters. After the signatures were filed and certified by the Maryland State Board of Elections, the ACLU, along with Charles J. Butler of the Washington law firm Covington & Burling and coalition partners, examined the petitions and found massive irregularities.
This landmark civil rights legislation passed thanks to the work of a large and diverse group of advocates, including the ACLU, acting in its role as the state's foremost civil rights organization. Governor Glendening signed the bill on May 15, 2001. Dwight Sullivan led the ACLU's efforts in the case, Gelbman v. Willis. Co-counsel are Art Spitzer of the ACLU of the National Capital Area and D. Jean Veta, Charles J. Butler and Chad Tang, pro bono attorneys from the Washington, D.C. law firm of Covington & Burling. |