Gay News

Badpuppy.com
Bush Welfare Proposals
Threaten GLBT Families says NGLTF

Bars Children of GLBT & Unmarried Parents Getting Benefits

Stigmatizes Youths, Prevents Adoptions and Disallows Loans

Compiled by GayToday


The Bush Administration is planning to change welfare policies that could have devastating affects on gay families 		Washington, D.C.--Existing welfare policies as well as proposals advocated by Bush Administration appointees could devastate gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (GLBT) families and individuals, according to a report released yesterday by the Policy Institute of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.

Welfare reform proposals could effectively bar children of GLBT parents and single or unmarried heterosexual parents from eligibility for benefits like access to Head Start programs and low-interest student loans.

Other initiatives could ban GLBT people from adopting or accessing fertility clinics, make divorce much harder to obtain, and stigmatize GLBT youth in the nation's schools.

The report, Leaving Our Children Behind: Welfare Reform and the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Community, analyzes welfare reform, its impact on poor GLBT people, and the threats posed to the entire GLBT community.

"Gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people are placed at grave risk by welfare reform. These initiatives are fundamentally about family policy - about promoting particular kinds of families while penalizing and stigmatizing others," said Lorri L. Jean, executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.

"Welfare is an issue of concern to all of us because how we treat the most vulnerable in our society says a lot about who we are."

Featured prominently is the so-called "charitable choice" faith-based initiative. It threatens to hand over entire social service sectors - $80 billion over 10 years - to anti-GLBT religious providers who can legally discriminate against GLBT people and people of other religions, and who can engage in sectarian proselytizing with tax dollars.

The welfare reform act of 1996, officially called the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, is up for reauthorization in 2002.

The outcome will surely be influenced by former prominent conservative movement leaders who now hold key policy-making positions within the Bush Administration, such as Wade Horn, Don Eberly, and Andrew Bush.

Leaving Our Children Behind documents their reactionary agenda to further change social service provision in the United States. While measures such as fatherhood initiatives, (heterosexual) marriage initiatives, abstinence-only education, and charitable choice may stem from good intentions, they make for bad public policy. Some of the more extreme proposals include:

  • Prioritizing the children of married heterosexual parents over other low-income children in the distribution of limited-supply benefits like Head Start slots and financial aid. Only if there is anything left over would the children of single parents and same-sex couples be allowed to access these benefits;

    • Related Stories from the GayToday Archive:
    100 Rights You Don't Have

    Civil Rights & Wrongs

    What Those School Vouchers Could Mean to You

    Related Sites:
    National Gay & Lesbian Task Force
    GayToday does not endorse related sites.

  • Forcing lesbian and bisexual women temporarily relying on welfare to allow their children's biological fathers to co-parent, or else risk losing benefits;

  • Outlawing adoption and the use of fertility clinics by same-sex couples and unmarried individuals;

  • Ending no-fault divorce and requiring mutual consent of both spouses before divorce is granted;

  • Strictly enforcing the abstinence-only-until-marriage provision, which has led some states' public health departments to turn back CDC AIDS prevention monies rather than spend them, out of fear of violating the provision. Many abstinence-only curricula reinforce dangerous stereotypes about GLBT people, girls, and people living with HIV.

    "Both the GLBT community and communities of color have a lot to lose if these reactionary proposals are implemented," said Jean.

    "This is not only an issue of concern to those supporting equal treatment of GLBT families, but also an issue of racial and economic justice."
    Downloaded or purchase the Report: http://www.ngltf.org/library


    • Visit Badpuppy.com