Badpuppy Gay Today |
Monday, 02 February 1998 |
Nuking America In preparing America for nuclear attack during the Cold War years following World War II, thousands of U.S. citizens became the innocent victims of over 4000 secret and classified radiation experiments conducted by the Atomic Energy Commision (AEC) and other government agencies, such as the Department of Defense, the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, the Public Health Service (now the CDC), the National Institutes of Health, the Veterans Administration (VA), the CIA and NASA. Millions of people were exposed to radioactive fallout from the continental testing of more than 200 atmospheric and underground nuclear weapons, and from the hundreds of secret releases of radiation into the environment. Over 200,000 "atomic vets" who worked closely with these nuclear detonations at the Nevada test Site during the 1950s and 60s were especially vulnerable to radiation fallout. Also severely affected were the thousands of so-called "downwinders," who lived in the nearby small towns of Nevada, Utah, Colorado and New Mexico. These downwinders (along with some animal populations) suffered the worst cumulative radioactive effects of fallout, along with a contaminated environment teeming with radioactive food and farm products. The plight of these mostly poor country people coping with government-induced radiation sickness has been recorded in Carole Gallagher's remarkable photo-essay American Ground Zero: The Secret Nuclear War (The Free Press, 1993). In reviewing declassified AEC records (now the Department of Energy) from the 1950s, Gallagher was shocked to discover one document that described the people downwind of the Nevada Test Site as "a low-use segment of the population." Her shock at such callous bigotry caused her to eventually move West to research, investigate and document those who lived closest to the Test Site, as well as workers at the site, and soldiers repeatedly exposed to the bombs during the military tests. Disinformation and nuclear fallout In the nuclear arms race government doctors and scientists brainwashed the public into believing low dose radiation was not harmful. Some officials even tried to convince people that "a little radiation is good for you." Totally ignored was the knowledge that the radiation which accompanies nuclear fallout could lead to an increased risk of cancer, heart disease, neurological disorders, immune system disease, reproductive abnormalities, sterility, birth defects, and genetic mutations which could be passed on from generation to generation. The full extent of this radiation damage to the American public during the Cold War years will never be known. A secret AEC document, dated 17 April 1947, reveals that physicians were well aware of these radiation hazards but simply ignored them. Under the title "Medical Experiments in Humans," the memorandum read: "It is desired that no document be released which refers to experiments with humans and might have adverse effect on public opinion or result in legal suits. Documents covering such work field should be classified 'Secret'." According to Gallagher, "many downwinders testified that the Public Health Service officials told them that their 'neurosis' about the fallout was the only thing that would give them cancer, particularly if they were female. Women with severe radiation illness, losing their hair, and with badly burned skin, were even clinically diagnosed in hospitals as 'neurotic.' Other severely ill women were diagnosed with 'housewife syndrome'." When Gallagher's investigation led her to ask a Department of Energy spokesperson about the AEC/DOE's practice of waiting until the wind blew toward Utah before testing nuclear bombs or venting radiation in order to avoid contaminating Las Vegas or Los Angeles, the unabashed and unconcerned official actually said on tape, "Those people in Utah don't give a shit about radiation." Secret Radiation Experiments Only recently, with the forced release of Top Secret documents, have details been revealed about these unethical and inhumane radiation studies conducted during the years 1944-1974. The initial story broke in November 1993 in a series of articles in the Albuquerque Tribune revealing the names of 18 Americans secretly injected with plutonium, a key ingredient of the atomic bomb and one of the most toxic radioactive substances known to man. Some, but not all, of the patients were terminally ill. The horrifying story by journalist Eileen Welsome (who later won a Pulitzer Prize) unleashed a storm of nationwide protest prompting Department of Energy Secretary Hazel O'Leary to order the release of secret files and documents pertaining to these Cold War experiments. The extremely dangerous plutonium experiment was performed under the auspices of the government's Manhattan Project, the revered group of distinguished scientists brought together to develop and test the atom bomb. The purpose of this and other secret experiments was to establish occupational health standards for workers who would be producing plutonium and other radioactive ingredients for the atomic bomb and the nuclear energy industry. Some of the other classified government experiments included: Exposing more than 100 Alaskan villagers to radioactive iodine during the 1950s. Feeding 49 retarded and institutionalized teen-agers radioactive iron and calcium in their cereal during the years 1946-1954. Exposing about 800 pregnant women in the late 1940s to radiactive iron to determine the effect on the fetus. Injecting 7 newborns (six were black) with radioactive iodine. Exposing the testicles of more that 100 prisoners to cancer-causing doses of radiation. This experimentation continued into the early 1970s. Exposing almost 200 cancer patients to high levels of radiation from cesium and cobalt. The AEC finally stopped this experiment in 1974. Administering radioactive material to psychiatric patients in San Francisco and to prisoners at San Quentin. Adminstering massive doses of full body radiation to cancer patients hospitalized at the General Hospital in Cincinnati, Baylor College in Houston, Memorial Sloan-Kettering in New York City, and the U.S. Naval Hospital in Bethesda, during the 1950s and 1960s. The experiment provided data to the military concerning how a nuclear attack might affect its troops. Exposing 29 patients, some with rheumatoid arthritis, to total body irradiation (100-300 rad dose) to obtain data for the military. Conducted at the University of California Hospital in San Francisco. The Atomic Energy Commission In 1995 the Energy Department admitted to over 430 radiation experiments conducted by the Atomic Energy Commission between the years 1944 and 1974. Over 16,000 people were radiated, some of whom did not know the health risks or did not give consent. These experiments were designed to help atomic scientists understand the human hazards of nuclear war and radiation fallout. Because the entire nuclear arms buildup was classified secret, these experiments were also stamped secret and allowed to take place under the banner of protecting "national security." Amazingly, these clandestine studies were conducted at the most prestigious medical institutions and colleges, including the University of Chicago, the University of Washington, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Vanderbilt University in Nashville, and the previously mentioned universities. Uranium Mine Workers In addition to these radiation experiments, workers who mined uranium for the AEC in the Four Corners area of Arizona, Utah, Colorado and New Mexico, were exposed to radioactive dust during the 1940s up to the 1960s. Although AEC scientists and epidemiologists knew the dust in these poorly ventilated mines were contaminated with deadly radon gas which could easily cause death from lung cancer, this lifesaving information was never passed on to the miners, many of whom were Native Americans. As a result, many miners died prematurely of cancer of the lung. Stewart Udall, an Arizona Congressman and lawyer who also served as Secretary of the Interior during the Kennedy and Johnson administrations, represented the miners and their families in a class action lawsuit against the federal government for radiation injuries. In The Myths of August (Pantheon Books), Udall writes that "some physicians who defended the decisions of the atomic establishment sought to justify these experiments by contending that little was known about the health risks associated with the various exposures. Others tried to put a positive face on tests conducted without obtaining informed consent by maintaining that these experiments nevertheless produced advances in medical knowledge." Some physicians argued that the conduct of the AEC doctors "should be condoned because they were merely following the 'prevailing ethics' of the postwar period." When the miners' case finally came to trial in 1983, the federal district court in Arizona dismissed the case by declaring the U.S. government was immune from suit. Medical Ethics How could these physician-experimenters ignore the sworn Hippocratic Oath promising that doctors will not harm their patients? Did they violate the Nuremberg Code of justice developed in response to the Nazi war crime trials after World War II? The Nuremberg Code includes 10 principles to guide physicians in human experimentation. In actuality, prior to the Nazi war crime tribunals, there was no written code for doctors; and lawyers defending the Nazi doctors tried to argue that similar wartime experiments were conducted with prisoners at the Illinois State Penitentiary, who were deliberately infected with malaria. During the Nuremberg trials the AMA came up with its own ethical standards, which included three requirements: 1) voluntary consent of the person on whom the experiment is to be performed must be obtained; 2) the danger of each experiment must be previously investigated by animal experimentation; and 3) the experiment must be performed under proper medical protection and management. The records now show that many victims of the government's radiation experiments did not voluntarily consent as required by the Code. As late as 1959, Harvard Medical School researcher Henry Beecher viewed the Code "as too extreme and not squaring with the realities of clinical research." Another physician said the Code had little effect on mainstream medical morality and "doubted the ability of the sick to understand the complex facts of their condition in a way that can make consent meaningful." Writing for the Journal of the American Medical Association in 1996, Jay Katz recalls an argument at Harvard Medical School in 1961 suggesting the Code was not necessarily pertinent to or adequate for the conduct of medical research in the United States. Katz writes: "The Medical research community found, and still finds, the stringency of the NC's first principle all too onerous." But patients in medical experiments people expect the experiments to help them in some way-not to harm them! Patients also are often inclined to totally trust their physician not to harm them. In his book The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code (Oxford University Press, 1992), Katz concludes that many doctors view the Code as "a good code for barbarians but an unnecessary code for ordinary physicians." The President's Advisory Committee In January 1994 President Clinton convened an Advisory Committee to investigate the accusations surrounding the human radiation experiments. In their final report presented to the president on October 3, 1995, the Committee found that up to the early 1960s it was common for physicians to conduct research on patients without their consent. Their harshest criticism was reserved for those cases in which physicians used patients without their consent in research from which the patients could not possibly benefit medically. These cases included the 18 people injected with plutonium at Oak Ridge Hospital in Tennessee, the University of Rochester in New York, the University of Chicago, and the University of California at San Francisco, as well as two experiments in which seriously ill patients were injected with uranium, six at the University of Rochester and eleven at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.The plutonium and uranium experiments undoubtedly put the subjects at increased risk for cancer in ten or twenty years' time. The Final Report of the President's Advisory Committee is now available in The Human Radiation Experiments, published in 1996 by Oxford Press (tel: 1-800-451-7556). Although the Committee studied the experiments in depth, there was no attempt to assess the damage done to individuals. In many cases, the names and records of the patients were no longer available, nor was there an easy way to identify how many experiments had been conducted, where they took place, and which government agencies sponsored them. The Department of Health and Human Services, the primary government sponsor of research, "had long since discarded files on experiments performed decades ago." The Committee discovered "the records of much of our nation's recent history had been irretrievably lost or simply could not be located" and "only the barest description remained" for the majority of the experiments. The Department of Energy also claimed all the pertinent records of its predecessor, the AEC, had been destroyed in the 1970s, but in some cases as late as 1989. All CIA records are classified. When records of the top secret MKULTRA program (in which unwitting subjects were experimented upon with a variety of substances) were requested, the CIA explained that all pertinent records had been destroyed during the 1970s when the program became a national scandal. Keeping government secrets The Committee made clear that its story could not have been told if the government did not keep some records that were eventually retrieved and made public. However, federal records management law also provides for the routine destruction of older records. Thus, in the great majority of cases the loss or destruction of requested documents was a function of normal record-keeping practices. The Committee was dismayed to report: "At the same time, however, the records that recorded the destruction of documents, including secret documents, have themselves been lost or destroyed. Thus, the circumstances of destruction (and indeed, whether documents were destoyed or simply lost) is often hard to ascertain. " In the Committee's judgment the AEC had repeatedly deceived the public by denying it had engaged in human experimentation, and by issuing cover stories to cover-up secret investigations, and by deliberately supplying incomplete information to people who participated in government-sponsored biomedical research. It was clear that once government information was 'born secret' it often remained that way. The Committee concludes: "The government has the power to create and keep secrets of immense importance to us all." Yet, without documents how can historians and other researchers uncover the truth about the government's clandestine activities? Where is "the smoking gun" when secret records are systematically shredded or reported as "lost?" We now know that many people were damaged during the government's Cold War period of of secrets and lies. But how can we uncover the medical and scientific secrets that remain hidden in the still classified documents from 1974 up till the present? In the absence of medical records and follow-up, the ultimate fate of individuals who willingly or unwillingly volunteered for these experiments is not known. The Committee simply did not have the time or resources to review individual files and histories. In many instances only fragmentary information survives about these experiments. And whether people were harmed in these experiments could not be ascertained. Current secret biomedical experimentation To this day there are still no adequate safeguards to protect people from secret government experimentation. Since the mid-1970s we have witnessed the spectacular rise of genetic engineering and molecular biology, as well as the concomitant outbreak of new and mysterious diseases like AIDS in homosexuals, chronic fatigue syndrome, the peculiar "Four Corners" lung disease first discovered on Navajo land, and the emergence of unprecedented viruses never before seen on the planet. Investigators linking the possible origin of these diseases to the dangerous genetic engineering of new microbes are often dismissed as paranoids and crackpots. The Persian Gulf War syndrome is yet another recent disease clouded in military and biologic secrecy with the cause still debated and the medical records of sick veterans often "lost" or otherwise unavailable. Not surprisingly, the same government institutions that funded the radiation experiments now largely control the research, funding, and cover stories pertaining to all these new diseases and viruses. What is clear from studying the Committee's Final Report is that the medical and scientific professions collaborated with the government and the military to abuse and harm U.S. citizens. In the process, the nuclear establishment literally got away with murder. How can we prevent this from happening again? One way might be to bring the physician perpetrators of these unethical experimenters to justice in a court of law. However, unless the public is aroused, this is unlikely to happen. In the Columbia Journalism Review, Geoffrey Sea notes: "A startling fact about the experiments is that, despite the documentation of hundreds of cases of unethical conduct resulting in lasting damage to thousands of people, not a single physician or nurse, scientist or technician, policy maker or administrator has yet come forward to admit wrongdoing." It would seem prudent for patients to stay away from continuing government- sponsored experimentation, especially those studies conducted at our leading medical institutions. Enlightened patients might also view doctors with a healthy dose of skepticism, and a touch of paranoia. As weird as all this sounds-it could save your life! References: Faden RR, Lederer SE, Moreno JD: U.S. medical researchers, the Nuremberg Doctors Trial, and the Nuremberg Code: A review of finding of the Advisory Committee on human radiation experiments. JAMA 1667-1671, 1996. Faden R: The Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Expeiments; Reflections on a presidential committee. Hastings Center Report 26 (no.5): 5-10, 1996. Gallagher, C: American Ground Zero: The Secret Nuclear War. The Free Press, New York, 1993. Katz, J: The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code, Oxford University Press, New York, 1993. Katz J: The Nuremberg Code and the Nuremberg trial. JAMA 276: 1663-1666, 1996. Sea, G: The radiation story no one would touch. Columbia Journalism Review, March/April 1994. The Human Radiation Experiments: Final Report of the Advisory Committee on Human Radation Experiments. Oxford University Press, New York, 1996. Udall, Stewart L: The Myths of August: A Personal Exploration of our Tragic Cold War Affair with the Atom. Pantheon Books, New York, 1994. Dr. Alan Cantwell is a physician and AIDS and cancer researcher. He is the author of AIDS & The Doctor of Death and The Cancer Microbe , both published by Aries Rising Press. He can be reached at PO Box 29532, Los Angeles, CA 90029. Phone/FAX (213) 462-6458. Email: alanrcan@aol.com Courtesy: Paranoia magazine, Issue #18, Winter 97/98, PO Box 1041, Providence, RI 02901.
© 1998 BEI;
All Rights Reserved.
For reprint permission: eMail gaytoday@badpuppy.com |