VIEWPOINT 
To March or Not To March  
 
 
From Jesse’s Journal 
My most memorable experience as a young gay activist in the Seventies was attending the first March on Washington for Lesbian and Gay Rights (1979). Along with Jack Campbell, the late Staci Aker, and the late Alex Ramon Muni, I represented Florida at a conference held in Houston to organize the March, where I met up-and-coming leaders like Eric Rofes. 
Jesse Monteagudo  
 
The March itself, held on October 14, 1979, was the end of a exciting weekend that included the first Third World Lesbian and Gay Conference, Pat Bond and Tom Wilson Weinberg concerts, and a fun-filled, if crowded, night at the Washington, D.C. Club Baths (it was 1979).  The second March on Washington was in 1987, by which time lesbian and gay rights had become a life-and-death struggle. Though Michael and I visited the Quilt and took part in The Wedding (we have the papers to prove it), we decided not to get arrested in front of the Supreme Court, as did many other activists.   For the third March on Washington, in 1993, we Floridians did not start walking until 5 p.m., by which time the Rally was halfway over. Thus we missed Larry Kramer crash the stage or Lea DeLaria express her lust for Hillary Rodham Clinton. We did see a contingent of "Gays Without Dates", cute boys on trees, and lesbian comic Robin Tyler, who organized the post-parade Rally, in a military uniform.  

Speaking of Tyler, the star of Always a Bridesmaid, Never a Groom is now at the center of controversy due to her suggestion that we hold a fourth March on Washington. Though named the "Millennium March on Washington for Equal Rights", Tyler's March will actually be a Rally on the Capitol Mall, to be held on April 30, 2000. Tyler, who envisioned herself as "executive producer" of the March, first proposed her idea at the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force's (NGLTF) Creating Change Conference. After the NGLTF rejected her suggestion, Tyler took it to the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) and the Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches (UFMCC), where she won the endorsement of those groups and their respective leaders, Elizabeth Birch and the Rev. Troy Perry. A third group, the National Latina/o Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Organization (LLEGO) soon joined in as a third major sponsor.  

Following LLEGO's endorsement, a diverse list of groups jumped on board to endorse the March. They include Apple Lambda, the GLBT Employee Group of Apple Computers; Camp Sister Spirit; Dignity/USA; the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association; Gay and Lesbian Parents Coalition; Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Veterans of America; the International Association of Lesbian and Gay Children of Holocaust Survivors; One Institute and Archives; Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG); and Q-Spirit. Community leaders like Larry Kramer, Del Martin and Phyllis Lyon, Michelangelo Signorile and the Rev. Mel White also came on board. There is also grassroots support for the March, as reflected in a recent Advocate poll in which 84% of those surveyed agreed that "gay men and lesbians should march on Washington, D.C., in the year 2000".  

Though LGBT support for a Millennium March is large and impressive, so is the opposition. Many of us who remember Tyler's performance as "executive producer" of the 1993 Rally do not want her around to repeat that fiasco in the year 2000. Unlike previous Marches, which came about after months of community deliberation and consensus, the Millennium March was decided upon by a few self-appointed leaders without input from the masses - or from other leaders. Those leaders, many of who have groups and egos of their own, have made their feelings known, loudly and clearly. Organizers of previous Marches, as well as the heads of the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD), the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Center and the National Black Lesbian and Gay Leadership Forum joined the NGLTF in questioning both the political strategy and the timing of the March. Political leaders and commentators like Barney Frank, Paul Harris, Stephen Miller, Kenneth Sherrill, Barbara Smith and Nadine Smith; movers and shakers who seldom agree on anything, have come together in their common opposition to the Millennium March.  

There are many reasons to oppose the Millennium March, not the least of which is the arrogance of Birch, Perry, Tyler and Martin Ornelas-Quintero, Executive Director of LLEGO, in deciding to hold on a March and expecting the rest of us to go along with it. A March on Washington costs a lot of money, both to the organizers and to the participants, money that could benefit local queer or AIDS organizations. The March is ill-timed: 2000 is an election year, when our communities' time would be better spent registering voters and working to elect gay or gay-friendly candidates.  

As a "veteran" of three Marches on Washington, I know how important a March can be in terms of community-building, outreach, public relations, and good plain fun. However, I must reluctantly agree with those who oppose the March, for many reasons. Putting together a March is hard work, and I am sure that most people who answered the Advocate survey in the affirmative are not going to volunteer. Though a March on Washington is an incredible ego-boost for those of us who take part in it, it accomplishes very little on a practical basis. We spend too much time partying and not enough time lobbying our legislators, a difficult task since most Senators and Representatives tend to be out of town whenever there is a March. Though President Clinton met with LGBT leaders before the 1993 March, this did not keep him from back-tracking on the issue of gays in the military or signing the Defense Of Marriage Act. A million-person March can't change a legislative, executive or judiciary mind, nor take the place of much-needed educational and political work on the state and local levels.  

As President Clinton once said, the era of big government is over. Outside of gays in the military, needle-exchange, DOMA and several other issues, the direction of our lives is being determined from our state capitals. It is the State of Florida that decided that my lovemaking is a crime; that does not want me to adopt children; and that refuses to guarantee my rights to housing or employment. It is in the State of Florida, and not the federal government, where the Christian Coalition has made headway; where it helped elect a conservative Legislature and where it looks forward to the likely election of a conservative Governor who will join the Legislature to give it anything it wants.  

Though our community's future in Tallahassee is dim, it is in Tallahassee -- and in our other state capitals -- where we must make ourselves heard. That is why I support the Federation of Statewide Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Political Organizations' proposed 50-state action, "Equality Begins at Home", scheduled to be held during the week of March 21-27, 1999. Endorsed by the NGLTF, and by statewide groups such as the Human Rights Task Force of Florida (HRTFFL), "Equality Begins at Home" will bring together thousands of queer people and our friends to march, rally, lobby and speak out at a time when our Legislatures are in session. A statewide march will be more representative of our communities than a Millennium March, if only because many of us who can't afford to go to Washington will be able to go to Tallahassee. Besides, it is good to try something new once in a while. Though the practical effects might not be greater than those achieved by a March on Washington, it does not hurt to try.  I welcome your comments. You may reach me c/o this publication or by e-mail at monteagu@bc.seflin.org