White
House Press Secretary
Mike
McCurry
|
Mike McCurry Says: Ignorance
and Untruths at Root of Prejudices
Cites Pressures on Republicans
from Gary Bauer and James Dobson
Compiled by
Badpuppy’s GayToday
From White
House Press Briefing Reports
|
At 1:30 p.m. Wednesday in the
White House Briefing Room, Presidential Press Secetrary Mike McCurry addressed
reporters and continued his previous day’s criticisms of Senator Trent
Lott’s anti-gay remarks made Monday, remarks strategically reinforced on
the following day by Rep. Dick Armey.
Same-sex love and affection,
according to Lott and Armey--both Majority Leaders in the House and
the Senate—is not only “a sin” disallowed by their Southern Baptist religious
heritage, but is also, according to these Republican politicians, a “disease”
or a condition such as kleptomania or alcoholism.
The text of the Wednesday
White House Press Briefing is as follows:
Question:
Mike -- the President's appeal to the Congress and pass a tobacco law,
could you detail for us a little bit some of the back and forth between
the Hill and the White House in the last few days to convince the Republicans
that this is the right thing to do?
Mr.
McCurry: Well, we've had numerous conversations with those who are
managing the bill on the floor to assess the situation. Our legislative
staff, Larry Stein, our Director of Congressional Relations, has been closely
in contact with leadership on both sides of the aisle. But I'd say that
the most important discussions have been the conversations that Mr. Bowles,
the Chief of Staff, has had directly with the Majority Leader, including
two telephone conversations so far today, and who knows, by the end of
the day, maybe even more.
Question:
Your comments yesterday about his backward thinking on homosexual relations,
do you think that played any part in the –
Mr.
McCurry: I can't imagine that, on an issue so fundamentally important
as the public health of children in America, that the Majority Leader would
take, you know, whatever anger he felt toward me and use that as something
that would affect the scheduling on this
Question:
Did he call you at all?
Mr.
McCurry: No, his office put out a statement in which they incorrectly
said that I was trying to judge right and wrong. Judgment of right and
wrong is done, you know, in my mind, by someone else. (Laughter.) And that's
not what this was about.
Question:
But you were saying he was wrong.
Mr.
McCurry: No, I said that he was incorrect when he said that homosexuality
is a disease. It is not. And that's all I said. I did not comment on theology,
nor would I, because he's entitled to have whatever personal belief of
conscience that he wants to have, as is any American.
Question:
Do you think it was wise of him to have and express that belief?
Mr.
McCurry: I think it's unwise when people, in saying something that
is not true, in saying something that reflects misconceptions that are
now decades old, when those – when leadership -- people in leadership positions
repeat that kind of thinking, it lends support to those who are trying
to be divisive and who are trying to set individual groups of Americans
against each other. And I think that's unfortunate when that happens.
Question:
He apparently believes it. I mean, at one point Pat Buchanan believed –
Mr.
McCurry: I'm sure he believes it. And I'm sure, you know, many of
us know exactly what Saint Paul wrote to the church of Corinth, too. And
I understand that and I respect that, but that's not the issue that I addressed
yesterday. I addressed a different question, which is, do you compare homosexuality
to a
disease, like alcoholism,
or kleptomania. And I thought that was very unfortunate that the Majority
Leader did that. And I still do today, regardless of what his office said.
Question:
So that was ignorant of him?
Mr.
McCurry: It was ignorant. And ignorance sometimes is the foundation
of prejudice.
Question:
What did the President say about your response?
Mr.
McCurry: I think the President knows exactly what I said yesterday
Question:
What does he think?
Mr.
McCurry: He probably would wish that we not have this kind of back
and forth on that issue, but at the same time, you know, he understands
why people feel strongly about it and he – he wanted to make sure that
I did not cast any aspersions on the Majority Leader's religious thinking.
And I didn't and I wouldn't.
Question:
Mike, what -- you connected this -- these kind of views to why the State
Department authorization bill is being held up?
Mr.
McCurry: Well, no, you asked me a question like, is this going to
affect any other bills, and off the top of my head, I thought of one and
there may be others. I didn't -- you asked me a question.
Question:
Right, and I asked you to give me an example and you gave me -- I'm just
wondering what abortion has to do with this.
Mr.
McCurry: Well, I think there is extreme pressure on the Republican
leadership in Congress to hew to a certain line. And it's being forced
on them by Mr. Bauer, Mr. Dobson, and others. In fact, they're very proud
of the fact that they are moving the Republican Party in that direction.
Mr. Bauer raises money based on his own strong criticism of the Republican
Party for not being anti-gay enough. And that's a very divisive thing.
And it's some commentary on the state of affairs in that party when you
see their leadership bend so directly to the admonitions of those who are
making those arguments. And you see that reflected in the way they've addressed
a lot of legislative issues, if I'm not mistaken.
Question:
Do you see any inconsistency in the position you're taking and the
position of the administration on homosexuals in the military?
Mr.
McCurry: No, because that is a policy-related issue and it doesn't
have anything to do with how you view homosexuality, whether or not it
is a trait that defines one's sexuality. I mean, that's the question that
is fundamental about what the Majority Leader had to say and it has nothing
to do with policy. The Majority Leader would be perfectly within bounds
if he criticized our policy on gays in the military or anything. That's
a matter of substance, a matter of policy.
The Press: Thank you.
END 2:05 P.M. EDT |