% IssueDate = "10/02/02" IssueCategory = "World" %>
![]()
|
says Yale Law Professor
Bush, by shifting the nation's forces from one military offensive to another, can draw the public's focus away from issues at home, such as the economy, and can hide his foreign policy blunders. "The more often the president attacks other countries pre-emptively, the more likely it becomes that our country will be attacked in turn. The president can then justify additional military action in response, and no patriotic American will oppose it.," he says. A leader who takes his nation to war "pushes aside all other concerns." Professor Balkin writes: "In this way, the president can effectively govern through war, with disastrous consequences for the nation and for the world. Armed with the doctrine of military pre-emption, the perpetual political campaign perfected by our last president might well become the perpetual military campaign of future presidents." Bush, believes the professor, had a legitimate reason to go on a war footing following the events of September 11. His stated goal of eliminating al Qaeda, however, or capturing Osama bin Laden, has been forgotten. "With victory not achieved and Afghanistan still unstable, he has now attempted to shift our attention to a new war with Iraq." The world faces a single man, says Professor Balkin, who is "armed with weapons of mass destruction, manifesting an aggressive, bullying attitude, who may well plunge the world into chaos and bloodshed if he miscalculates. This person, belligerent, arrogant and sure of himself, truly is the most dangerous person on Earth. The problem is that his name is George W. Bush, and he is our president." |
|